MAIN
NEWS

Articles
REVIEWS
PREVIEWS
INTERVIEWS
EDITORIALS
FEATURES
STRATEGY GUIDES
HARDWARE

Resources
CHEATS
GALLERY
RELEASE DATES
BETA CENTER
LINKS
FORUM
GAMERS DATABASE

Downloads
DEMOS
PATCHES
GAME TOOLS
MAPS/SCENARIOS

SGO
ABOUT US
FAQ
FEEDBACK
HOSTING

Subscribe to our
Free Newsletter!



  

 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]UGO

FEATURES

Gen Con 1999:
gc99_logo.jpg (12497 bytes)

Would you like to play?

By Steve Lieb

If you would like to comment on this article, please post a message on our forum.

Click here to go back. 

aok2logo.gif (17280 bytes)

Next I hustled my booty over to the Microsoft booth to speak with Bruce Shelley, producer of Age of Empires 2: Age of Kings.  Bruce is an icon of the strategic gaming scene: he worked with Sid Meier in the production of such minor titles as Railroad Tycoon and Civilization, before starting his own company (Ensemble Studios) and developing the premiere title, Age of Empires.  Now Ensemble is working on Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings (scheduled for 10/99 release) and I was fortunate enough to have a chance to chat with him about it.   Age of Kings is a continuation of the gameplay in Age of Empires, a real time strategic 4x game.  While it's a clear descendant of the original title, AoK builds significantly enough to be considered a major evolutionary step in the series.  When I asked him about this, Bruce said there are really three different areas in which Age of Kings differentiates itself from it's predecessors AoE (and it's expansion, RoR).

First and most obviously, the game Age of Kings takes place in a different era.   Age of Empires covered the Stone Age to the Iron Age, focusing on the development of classical civilizations such as the Greeks or Babylon.  The Rise of Rome expansion for AoE covered, well, you can probably guess.  In that sense, AoE was really the RTS successor to Civilization.  Age of Kings departs from that and moves the entire timeline to 500-1500 AD.  New races (mostly), new units, and new structures all require a serious rethinking by any player familiar with AoE.  This isn't a re-hashed old formula - this is an entirely new strategic balance and in many senses, an entirely new game.

Secondly, according to Bruce, they looked long and hard at the feedback from players from AoE, and spent a major effort in addressing these concerns.  The AI code was totally rewritten from the ground up.  The enemy computer players now have dynamic strategies, responsive to what their opponents (be they human or computer) are trying to accomplish.  If the human player is developing a dominant lead in cavalry units, the computer may examine its own economics and determine that competing with the human in that field is pointless, and switch to the rapid production of pikemen. 

It's not just the enemy AI that was rewritten - there are subtle but significant changes to the helper AI that are a result of Ensemble's partnership with the massive Microsoft useability labs. Bruce said they spent a lot of time watching players totally unfamiliar with the product, who were struggling to figure out what was happening.   They then went back to the codebenches and used this knowledge to seriously reduce the amount of micromanagement required, but - importantly - not to take any of the control away from more advanced players.  This is a huge issue which I fear will be missed by most players - beginners will play it without realizing how very much work went into "holding their hand without letting them know it's being held" (my quote, not Bruce's).  Expert players will employ advanced functions without even realizing that they are bypassing supports for newbies.  He listed a multitude of management-reducing functions, some of the few I'll recount here:

  • Much-improved pathfinding AI - one of the early complaints about every RTS is that units get lost when they run into trees, water, building, etc.  AoE was no exception to this as a first-generation RTS game and had its own share of issues.  But AoK's pathfinding is superlative.  Selected units not only will move more intelligently, but will actually form up into column and march to their deployment.  Honestly, it looks awesome.
  • Unit orders such as guard, patrol and follow - as well as actual formation movement - will make the manipulation of large numbers of troops much easier.  It's possible that, with such commands, in AoK large-scale battles will actually resemble the historic realities of lines and flanks, rather than degenerating into brutal mass melees.
  • The Town Bell - tired of your foraging villagers being helplessly slaughtered when the enemy makes a rush on your city, simply because you couldn't click fast enough to order them all to return?  AoK implements a Town Bell, situated in the center of every town's center.  When first your watchtowers identify an enemy attack, you click on the town bell and all your villagers run to the nearest structures and take shelter therein from the marauding enemy.  Almost equally as important: when the attackers are driven off, another click on the Town Bell will send your villagers back to exactly what they were doing before!

There are other gameplay changes too, such as allowing the garrisoning of structures, the boarding of ships, and improved production queuing and waypoints all contribute to simultaneously easing the burden while expanding the options for players.

Multiplay too was scrutinized, and Bruce highlighted a couple of multiplay-specific improvements.  One was the addition of a different multiplay scenario called Regicide.  Rather than the simple RTS formula of "kill them all" Regicide adds an interesting twist: the success (or failure) of a player depends on the survivability of their single king/queen.  Anything that keeps your ruler alive, or will kill the enemy ruler(s), is an intrinsic good.  It doesn't matter if you have a city spanning half the map - if your king is killed, you lose.  This should add a lot of flavor to the online arenas.  The other feature that really stood out for my was the "highlight flare" feature for cooperating online players.  For example - in AoE if you were playing online with someone and you wanted to coordinate an attack , or draw their attention to something, describing it in text was practically a party game in itself: "Send your unit to the third tree by the hill, not the brown tree, wait, I'm not counting bushes.  OK, he's . . .wait, go back."  Now, when you want to draw someone's attention to something on the map you simply scroll to the spot, and set off the flare.  Whoever you want can see the flare, making the map & chat systems work in conjunction like a virtual whiteboard.

Last but not least, Ensemble made the graphics downright beautiful - the maps are bigger, the buildings even more detailed and active.  Bruce said one of the early issues they confronted was the fact that, since the maps were much bigger in AoK than AoE, the artists went a little wild and were designing large, complex structures.  As Bruce put it, "Well, that's fine if you are an artist running your monitor at 1280 x 1024, but when you'd reduce the screen to 800x600 - as many of our players might have to - the buildings filled the screens!  So we took a week and forced everyone - the artists included - to run it at 800x600.  Then we went back and worked on the buildings." he said with a smile.  The result was, I think, a good one.   The buildings seem more appropriately scaled with the terrain and figures.   Importantly now, they will play just was well on 15" monitors at 8x6 as they do on 24" monitor supersystems.

But lest you think that there was any sacrifice in the detail or esthetics, think again.  AoK will no doubt be heralded as one of the most beautiful RTS games to ever hit the shelf.  Units, structures, and even the terrain, have all been thoroughly done to the minutest degree - for example, the animation of the Frank special axe unit, the figure actually walks as if he's clearly carrying a really heavy axe to one side.

Needless to say, I've joined the slavering hordes waiting for this game to come out - the release date can't come soon enough for me!

Bruce was also forthcoming with info about Ensemble, which now comprises upwards of 50 employees on the East Coast, West Coast, and Texas.  One thing I didn't realize is that they now employ Sandy Petersen - yes, THAT Sandy Petersen, formerly famous for everything in the gaming field from Runequest, to Call of Cthulhu, to id Software and little titles like Doom, Quake, and now RoR and AoK.  Sandy is one of the most creative minds in the industry today and the fact that he's working togther with Bruce suggests that Ensemble is definitely a company to watch.

In that vein, I asked Bruce what we could look for from Ensemble in the  future.   He said that they would stick with real-time, since they (obviously, to my mind) do that very well.  But with 50 people, he felt that it was very possible for them to be working on two projects at once and were considering their options for the spare capacity.   This "second project" he affirmed would probably NOT be real time.   With their experience, talent, and people - I can't wait to see what they have up their collective sleeves!

Click here to read more about GenCon!

 

Copyright © 1999 Strategy Gaming Online. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or in any medium without express permission of Strategy Gaming Online is prohibited.